The country's first vertical monopoly case is considered the final judgment of Johnson & Johnson monopoly - Beijing Sheng Feng Law Firm _ lawyers blog
August 11, 2010, Rui state sued Johnson & Johnson "price fixing", requiring Johnson & Johnson more than 14 million yuan compensation for economic losses.
Under "By hearing the case, for enterprises to effectively comply with the" anti-monopoly law "to regulate the conduct of operations tommy to provide useful inspiration. Limiting minimum resale price agreements are not illegal, of course, but to eliminate or restrict competition in the market situation is likely to constitute a monopoly agreement , signed the agreement to implement the monopoly operators will bear the corresponding legal responsibility. "Shanghai China three High Court Tribunal Zhu Dan said.
Other articles 韩明辉 Guangzhou's first microblogging copyright infringement forwarded by the Ministry of Commerce ordered to pay 1,000 yuan for the electricity suppliers are established marketing rules "regulate commerce marketing operations" and other standards have been included in the plan unconstitutional Korea NRS sentenced Do not take legislature when the "scapegoat" in Chinese, you can do whatever they want? Whether guidance on the implementation of the work in the trial effectively regulate the exercise of discretion uniform application of foreign tommy laws to protect the licensing process tommy acts constitute infringement? - Crocodile clear case worth considering Commerce Trade Development "next": network marketing to establish a blacklist of illegal operation of online shopping system to prosecute Canadian IT companies for patent infringement latest articles Facebook commodity trading and related services, network management approach (draft) National CFA's first vertical monopoly case Johnson was identified certain monopoly Shanghai Culture and Arts Co. v. Shanghai and Shanghai tommy Theatre tommy infringement dispute about the right of adaptation works monopoly point of view of Internet-depth analysis of Baidu v. 360 unfair competition cases of first instance verdict in 2012 China judicial tommy protection of intellectual property court 10 cases, 10 cases and 50 innovative typical court case in 2012 China IPR judicial protection status (Chinese) Youku and watercress because webcasting movie "love" was sentenced to a common site for the first time sentenced to infringement abetting infringement grassroots tommy courts are authorized to hear patent cases Sheng Feng Law Firm website for the latest articles
August 11, 2010, Rui state sued Johnson & Johnson "price fixing", requiring Johnson & Johnson more than 14 million yuan compensation for economic losses.
Under "By hearing the case, for enterprises to effectively comply with the" anti-monopoly law "to regulate the conduct of operations tommy to provide useful inspiration. Limiting minimum resale price agreements are not illegal, of course, but to eliminate or restrict competition in the market situation is likely to constitute a monopoly agreement , signed the agreement to implement the monopoly operators will bear the corresponding legal responsibility. "Shanghai China three High Court Tribunal Zhu Dan said.
Other articles 韩明辉 Guangzhou's first microblogging copyright infringement forwarded by the Ministry of Commerce ordered to pay 1,000 yuan for the electricity suppliers are established marketing rules "regulate commerce marketing operations" and other standards have been included in the plan unconstitutional Korea NRS sentenced Do not take legislature when the "scapegoat" in Chinese, you can do whatever they want? Whether guidance on the implementation of the work in the trial effectively regulate the exercise of discretion uniform application of foreign tommy laws to protect the licensing process tommy acts constitute infringement? - Crocodile clear case worth considering Commerce Trade Development "next": network marketing to establish a blacklist of illegal operation of online shopping system to prosecute Canadian IT companies for patent infringement latest articles Facebook commodity trading and related services, network management approach (draft) National CFA's first vertical monopoly case Johnson was identified certain monopoly Shanghai Culture and Arts Co. v. Shanghai and Shanghai tommy Theatre tommy infringement dispute about the right of adaptation works monopoly point of view of Internet-depth analysis of Baidu v. 360 unfair competition cases of first instance verdict in 2012 China judicial tommy protection of intellectual property court 10 cases, 10 cases and 50 innovative typical court case in 2012 China IPR judicial protection status (Chinese) Youku and watercress because webcasting movie "love" was sentenced to a common site for the first time sentenced to infringement abetting infringement grassroots tommy courts are authorized to hear patent cases Sheng Feng Law Firm website for the latest articles
No comments:
Post a Comment