Saturday, February 22, 2014

Breastfeeding is something quite normal, that

Breastfeeding is (not) the best | Breastfeeding - the best choice
Home advisers breastfeeding Breastfeeding Week World Breastfeeding Week 2006 World Breastfeeding Week 2007 World Breastfeeding Week 2008 Photo Gallery World Breastfeeding Week 2009 World Breastfeeding Week 2010 World Breastfeeding Week 2011 World Breastfeeding i won t give up Week 2012 World Breastfeeding Week 2013 Brochures
News From the corner of my mom's World Breastfeeding Week 2012 World Breastfeeding Week 2013 Start Breastfeeding Pregnancy - think about breastfeeding at the time of changes in the breast during pregnancy first month after birth in the maternity Breastfeeding When the milk starts to first breastfeed What do I do when I get home from the maternity hospital About colostrum Proper placement of the baby on the breast Preparing for breastfeeding breast milk ejection reflex Breastfeeding: A to Z Mum's concerns Izmlazanje i won t give up Normal weight gain jumps in the development of introduction of complementary foods and continued breastfeeding Breastfeeding Breastfeeding twins in pregnancy and tandem Breastfeeding during pregnancy Tandem nursing Exclusive breastfeeding i won t give up and lactation at the request of the most common problems Problems with baby problems Flat nipples and nipple Mastitis overfilling of breast milk clogging channels weaning how long to breastfeed? News Video Q & Media clipping i won t give up
Breastfeeding is something quite normal, that's true. Artificial feeding i won t give up is neither the same, or better, and is therefore less complete and less. These are hard words, but those with the right to exist in our vocabulary. Advisers to breastfeed say: "You have a chance that your baby insure the best possible start in life, and through breastfeeding get a unique bond with your child."
Partly because of such and similar sentences, "screaming" and with advertisements leading manufacturers adapted milk. When our claims contrary phrases from aggressive i won t give up advertising industry adapted milk formula was, one of us must be mistaken, and it will not be that these multinationals. Here are some of the expressions that I think undermine our good intentions every time you use them: The best possible, ideally, optimally, perfectly Are we perfect i won t give up parents? Are our homes ideal? Do you feed the best possible? Of course not. These are the goals we are striving, not minimum standards. Yes reformulated: Are We inadequate parents? i won t give up
When we (and the artificial milk manufacturers) say that breastfeeding i won t give up is the best way of feeding babies, because their composition provides an ideal meal, perfectly balanced according to your baby's optimal needs, the logical response is "so what?" Experience tells us that the optimum is not essential. Normally it is quite enough, and the word "normally" be sailed, i won t give up with its occupational safety and adequacy, artificial milk. In fact, breastfeeding i won t give up is normative. Artificial milk is not the same, no better than the mother, in fact, worse, are defects, less complete. What "wrong" i won t give up benefits? Benefits. When we talk about the benefits of breastfeeding - on "lower rates" breast cancer, a "small probability" for the occurrence of allergies, about "easy connection" on "stronger" immune system - we again affirm adapted formula for an acceptable norm. In health care use biological, not cultural criteria, and variations of them are divided according to their usefulness or harmfulness. Smokers have a higher incidence, higher doses of folic acid during pregnancy reduces the risk of embryonic defects. Since breast milk biological criteria i won t give up are not breastfed babies "healthier", but artificially fed children get sick more often and more seriously. Chair of breastfed babies do not smell "nicer"; artificial diet results in embarrassing smell, reflecting difficulties in the baby's intestines. We can not expect to create a culture of breastfeeding, if you do not insist that it is a model of health, both orally and in literature. We must not be seen as weakness, and our media colleagues misstate the facts. When you failed to explain i won t give up the dangers of artificial milk, deprive mothers of crucial information necessary for its decision. Mother with problems in breastfeeding may not pay for advice only to achieve a "special bonus", but may seek help if you know how she and her baby have to lose. The smaller the probability that it will introduce baby formula milk, only that it is "used to the bottle," if you know how much damage it causes. Nowhere did not loose the illusion of a bottle as standard so well tucked up, as in discussions of cognitive development. When you ask a group of health professionals, whether they are familiar with the study of smoking in pregnancy and IQ (1), an always statement that children of mothers who smoke are "lower IQ". When I ask for a study of preterm infants fed human milk or artificial (2), some always known that babies hrenjene human milk "smarter". None of the studies I have not seen presented in any other context, nor the media, nor even by the authors themselves. Even the health workers shocked i won t give up when reformulated results using breast milk as a measure: artificially fed children, and children of smokers have a lower IQ. Distortion of reality becomes even more deceptive when used percentages, because the numbers are

No comments:

Post a Comment