Does not require signature. Already a 3 play (4play) that yes, requires being `amarrado`. In this c

After the "Internet at will" private outlet NOS is advancing with a new campaign that will surely be talked about: one that promises to offer "net forever." First, import mention that I have nothing against NOS (ex-ZON), and I think they do very well and innovative campaigns that offer favorable terms to their customers - and hope that the times when blatantly lied to clients about the traffic shaping and secret traffic limits are a distant memory of the past who want to forget. However, I can not help but always feel a little "abusive" (or unfortunate) choice of words for your campaigns ... in this case the "net forever." Let's see what they tell us: "From now until August 31, is in effect another innovative campaign of NOS, which offers 200MB monthly internet forever, to all customers who purchase during this period smartphones or mobile phones with access Internet.'s campaign, launched under the motto 'You deserve a smartphone with net forever', is available to current and new customers, subscribers of prepaid tariff without private outlet internet included. " Now ... what does this can lead us to think? If I NOS customer, and buy a smartphone with internet access, prepaid tariff without internet, step right to have 200MB of monthly data on the same ... forever? Ie being fulfilled the conditions for enjoyment of the campaign, private outlet I get it "forever", as we are told? And if next month I decide to stop being a customer? ... Go me take something that gave me "forever"? So no longer private outlet will be "forever", is not it? So why not write because things as they are, that offer 200MB of monthly data to customers who do not yet have internet - while -permanecerem customers? Maybe it's me I'm too weird, after all the years that we had to learn by force not believe what operators advertise; maybe most people automatically assume that the condition of permanence as a customer is implicit in the campaign. Tell me what you think ... (And I end by saying that even with this issue to criticize the way the promotion is presented, very well think that NOS do something like this - alone is worth more once forget all the customers you already have, and who could extend the same courtesy ... after all, it was time to see an operator to appreciate the loyalty of existing customers, rather than simply offering more advantageous terms for the new.)
Nothing special. Any package 3p already gives 200mb mobile net / month. Here requires a monthly subscription of voice, something that many people do not need / want not. Another promotion that wants to us that seems monumental, private outlet but it's just packaging, without content. Delete Reply
Does not require signature. Already a 3 play (4play) that yes, requires being `amarrado`. In this campaign the client can enjoy the 200MB forever using any prepaid range of NOS, without tuition or mandatory charges (eg. Tariff `Livres`). private outlet It is a campaign that can work very well, for example for those with a Dual-Sim, you can make use of 200MB forever without any charges, excluding the purchase of equipment that will have to be made, of course ... =) For this purpose there has equipment covered by the campaign around 50 . Can also give way to those who use it for and Voip this is to subscribe at this time a plan equivalent data, which incidentally, currently has the minimum monthly cost of 2.90 (200MB) in the market, particularly in the USO, this for the case of prepaid without any obligations. It's a good campaign to promote the sale of equipment. Of course when you get here the FreedomPop (here spoken) with 500MB totally free this kind of campaigns lose any interest ... Perhaps our operators private outlet are beginning to visualize this fact, combining the fact of knowing that Portugal is traditionally a market for pre -pagos and many never will be interested in all of its pacotões who want to foist !! with fidelizações of 24months !! ... and top it off with a `miseros` 200MB. Write off
In the Kanguru "at will", which did aa analogy with "unlimited" seemed to me that you had no reason. private outlet Kanguru has never been prepaid private outlet unlimited - 15 for 15 h gave the navigation or 1GB of traffic, and proceeded to give a (and only one) month traffic unlimited (subject to reduction exceeded the speed 15GB). It seemed you were to write: "The kook, where before they said" unlimited "for failing to be able to say, have aa say" at will "." At least that, possible interpretation is visible in the comments. Now, obviously, the 200MB "forever" is as long as the client. So the guy goes to another operator and NOS continued to pay him the 200MB? PS I had a family stuck in the imbroglio exam